There is a need to discipline some members of the female species, to curb their False Cause—it is hurting humanity, you see. Majority of the so-called empowered women today are not even feminazis—they are simply young girls who are miseducated about feminism, proper gender relations, and basic philosophies underlying acts of resistance against gender-based oppression. In pursuit of empowerment, they silence, ignore, and crush the men’s cause. Both sexes fight the same hegemonic structure, but because men and women do not have a shared history of oppression, women tend to overlook the masculine agenda. A covert and suppressive matriarchal order dominates men’s experiences in society—that realm is not politics, religion, or commerce, but our day-to-day, face-to-face social interaction. It is here where they conduct, with good cheer, acts of violence against men.

Women’s sickening demand for convenience in almost all affairs of life is responsible for holding men accountable merely by existing at all. Since they cannot freely participate in narratives of mastery (e.g. initiating courtship, participation in war) because of their inherent physiological design, women have inverted their vices into virtues and invented a new hegemonic structure that would put them in a privileged position.

One such inversion/invention is the glorification of the feminine personality trait of being “sensitive”. Women are said to be sensitive by nature—because of this, men are suddenly answerable to the volatility or the irregular fluctuations of their emotions. In order to support this, women have created some social instruments to force men into submitting themselves to this new order by ostracizing them if they do not subscribe to it.

One such instrument is the notion that men should not be insensitive to women—violating this entails being labeled “immature” or “childish”. This charge of puerility involves adult men losing the respect due to them merely by going against this matriarchal construct.

But what is the real goal of this construct? Convenience for women, in relationships with men. What can be more degenerate than this? The False Women’s Cause is nothing but anti-life.

Resentment is the origin of feminist thought. The women's cause is basically an expression of hatred against men, mixed with jealousy and frustration--this truth is disguised in  discourses that attempt to exclude men, like Helene Cixous' ecriture feminine.

It is natural that a meek lamb should bear a grudge against the lion for its vicious strength, but that is no reason to hold the great lion accountable for its existence. 

The general incredulity toward human existence is already present even in the First Wave Feminism, which originated from John Stuart Mill's liberalism. That all sexes should be equal is already a sign of the degradation of humanity, because it stifles the natural tendency of humans to compete and promote the order of rank that is due to all living things.

How do you explain the phenomenon of pairing in the context of gender oppression? Why do people try to match a boy and a girl together even though the boy and the girl do not like each other, at first?

Given that women in society are forbidden by the patriarchal order to engage in the pursuit of any form of mastery, approaching a man is considered immoral. For men, a woman's proactive attitude in the game of romance is frightening and undesirable.

Hence, with the presence of this oppressive social practice (for women), the feminazis have introduced a cunning instrument to subject the male species under their power: the practice of pairing. When a group of people tries to pair a male with another female, the pairing is usually in favor of the female. Even though members of the group (who try to pair people together) can be mixed in terms of sex and gender, the practice is predominantly feminazist. Because women are barred from pursuing men (they will be ostracized if they try do so), pairing puts women into a strategic position in the game of romance. This removes the man's right to choose his partner. When he refuses the pairing, the group usually ridicules him and gives him labels. Not wanting to be ostracized, the man is then forced to accept the pairing and tries to learn loving the woman he is paired with.

The group is usually on the side of the woman (because, being a woman, she has to be bestowed with the power to choose)--whatever is preferred by the woman is preferred by the group who tries to pair people together. Thus, with the woman's influence over the group, and the group's power over the man, it is clear that pairing is a female apparatus of oppression.

Every man in today's society must reclaim his manhood from the shackles of militant feminist thought. It is my belief that there is a covert matriarchal order in socety that attempts to instigate the propagation of female empowerment at the expense of men's basic gender rights.

One socially accepted practice that significantly discriminates the male is the idea of 'supplication' in courtship. That one gains a female's favor (consciously or unconsciously on the part of the woman) by providing her with jewelry and other expensive gifts is a construct of this oppressive matriarchal order. Another culturally determined anti-male political practice is the silencing of men's right against violence.

The first step in overturning this new hegemonic structure is, of course, recognizing the existence of male oppression vis-a-vis feminist acts of resistance against the patriarchal order. It must be understood that my idea of masculism (as opposed to feminism) is not a promotion of the male hegemonic structure, but an egalitarian philosophy with the goal of redressing gender oppression characterized by an abuse of feminist thought, focusing on men's experiences.

The first difficulty of promoting male acts of resistance is the acknowledgment that a covert matriarchal order exists. However, a close inspection of this difficulty would reveal the underlying anti-male scheme. By establishing the male stereotype that he should be firm and strong in all aspects of life, the femme-nazi becomes successful in discouraging a man from engaging in any form of public discourse to pursue the men's cause. They have made this discourse (e.g. this blog) appear in such a way that to talk about the "men's cause" is an embarrassment to the male species.

Comes now the time to break our silence.